<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wishing..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cricalix.net/archives/2007/03/19/wishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cricalix.net/archives/2007/03/19/wishing/</link>
	<description>Going sane since 1978</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cricalix</title>
		<link>http://www.cricalix.net/archives/2007/03/19/wishing/comment-page-1/#comment-8746</link>
		<dc:creator>cricalix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricalix.net/archives/2007/03/19/wishing/#comment-8746</guid>
		<description>My standard answer - when I can afford one, I'll think about it :)  Need to run Win32 for one application though, unless CCP get their act in gear and provide a native client.  A 24" iMac would be quite nice though, other than the fact that it's only a NVidia 7300 - perhaps there'll be a product line refresh (there are certainly enough rumours) that will bring it into the 8xxx series of cards by the time I could afford it.  The 3 GB memory cap (in the Apple store) is also strange given the *nix underpinnings of OS X.

The Hive Mind on Ars Technica appears to maintain that the 50mm is the same, regardless of full size or APS-C - it's just the crop that changes, necessitating manual zooming with one's feet.  Course, I could be misunderstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My standard answer - when I can afford one, I&#8217;ll think about it :)  Need to run Win32 for one application though, unless CCP get their act in gear and provide a native client.  A 24&#8243; iMac would be quite nice though, other than the fact that it&#8217;s only a NVidia 7300 - perhaps there&#8217;ll be a product line refresh (there are certainly enough rumours) that will bring it into the 8xxx series of cards by the time I could afford it.  The 3 GB memory cap (in the Apple store) is also strange given the *nix underpinnings of OS X.</p>
<p>The Hive Mind on Ars Technica appears to maintain that the 50mm is the same, regardless of full size or APS-C - it&#8217;s just the crop that changes, necessitating manual zooming with one&#8217;s feet.  Course, I could be misunderstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabil</title>
		<link>http://www.cricalix.net/archives/2007/03/19/wishing/comment-page-1/#comment-8739</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 21:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cricalix.net/archives/2007/03/19/wishing/#comment-8739</guid>
		<description>Just gonna toss this out there, because you know I have to: "Get a Mac."

:)

As far as the tripods go: I've been quite happy with the Bogen Manfrotto line, and recently replaced the one that was stolen during the summer with a nice Wilderness.  As far as an honest to god lightweight tripod goes, my eye definitely wanders to the Gitzo line of carbon fibre tripods.  I had a chance to handle their Reporter carbon fibre tripod, and it blew me away.  Sans-head, it weighs maybe a pound!  And yet, despite being lightweight, it's still remarkably rigid and stable with a full mounted head on top.  What it comes down to, though, is that you're going to triple your price going carbon fibre, plain and simple.

Things to think on :).

After bothering with a prime myself, I definitely second your thoughts on picking up a prime.  Nikon's Nikkor lenses are pretty damned fantastic, and at a quick glance, the 50mm f/1.8D would probably rock your needs quite happily.  That said, the D80 has that pesky lens multiplier endemic with dSLRs, so maybe it'd be worth looking at the 35mm f/2D instead?  Hmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just gonna toss this out there, because you know I have to: &#8220;Get a Mac.&#8221;</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>As far as the tripods go: I&#8217;ve been quite happy with the Bogen Manfrotto line, and recently replaced the one that was stolen during the summer with a nice Wilderness.  As far as an honest to god lightweight tripod goes, my eye definitely wanders to the Gitzo line of carbon fibre tripods.  I had a chance to handle their Reporter carbon fibre tripod, and it blew me away.  Sans-head, it weighs maybe a pound!  And yet, despite being lightweight, it&#8217;s still remarkably rigid and stable with a full mounted head on top.  What it comes down to, though, is that you&#8217;re going to triple your price going carbon fibre, plain and simple.</p>
<p>Things to think on :).</p>
<p>After bothering with a prime myself, I definitely second your thoughts on picking up a prime.  Nikon&#8217;s Nikkor lenses are pretty damned fantastic, and at a quick glance, the 50mm f/1.8D would probably rock your needs quite happily.  That said, the D80 has that pesky lens multiplier endemic with dSLRs, so maybe it&#8217;d be worth looking at the 35mm f/2D instead?  Hmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
